mouse: be at desktop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desktop 1.00
be used to interface with computer 0.80
be at computer 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be at desktop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(computer mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, be at desktop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mouse, be at desktop)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mouse, be used to interface with computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mouse, be at computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mouse, be used to interface with computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mouse, be at computer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mouse, be used to interface with computer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be used to interface with computer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at computer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at desktop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mouse, be at desktop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at desktop)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be at desktop)