mouse: be at field

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at field 1.00
be at any field 0.91
be at pasture or field 0.83
be at grassy field 0.81
be at corn field 0.81
be at field under rock 0.81
be at grain field 0.78
be at rice field 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at field under rock)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(mouse, be at field)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mouse, be at corn field)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at corn field)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mouse, be at grain field)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at grain field)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mouse, be at corn field)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at grain field)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at corn field)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mouse, be at grain field)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at field)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mouse, be at field)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at field) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lizard, be at field under rock)