mouse: eat wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, peripheral
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.61
, organism
Weight: 0.61
Siblings house mouse
Weight: 0.70
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, blue jay
Weight: 0.58
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat wood 1.00
eat plastic 0.81
eat styrofoam 0.81
eat 0.81
eat chocolate 0.79
eat paper 0.79
eat wax 0.79
eat cheese 0.78
eat poop 0.76
eat clothes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rodent, eat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mouse, eat wood)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rodent, eat plastic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mouse, eat wood)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(rodent, eat poop)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mouse, eat wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat plastic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(rodent, eat poop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat plastic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rodent, eat poop)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rat, eat plastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rat, eat cheese)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rat, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(rodent, eat plastic)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rodent, eat)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(rodent, eat poop)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mouse, eat wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rat, eat cheese)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rat, eat cheese)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rat, eat plastic)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rat, eat plastic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rat, eat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rat, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mouse, eat wood)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mouse, eat cheese)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat cheese)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mouse, eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mouse, eat cheese)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mouse, eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mouse, eat cheese)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mouse, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mouse, eat wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rodent, eat plastic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rodent, eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rodent, eat poop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rat, eat plastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(rat, eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(rat, eat cheese)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rodent, eat plastic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rodent, eat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mouse, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rodent, eat poop)