mouse: have big ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, peripheral
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.61
, organism
Weight: 0.61
Siblings house mouse
Weight: 0.70
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, blue jay
Weight: 0.58
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big ears 1.00
has physical part ears 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(house mouse, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(house mouse, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(house mouse, has physical part ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have big ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mouse, have big ears)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mouse, has physical part ears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mouse, has physical part ears)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mouse, has physical part ears)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(mouse, has physical part ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have big ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mouse, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(house mouse, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have big ears)