mouse: have long tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, peripheral
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.61
, organism
Weight: 0.61
Siblings house mouse
Weight: 0.70
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, blue jay
Weight: 0.58
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tails 1.00
need tails 0.93
has physical part tails 0.90
has physical part tail 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mouse, have long tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mouse, have long tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mouse, have long tails)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(mouse, has physical part tails)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mouse, need tails)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mouse, has physical part tails)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mouse, has physical part tails)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mouse, has physical part tails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mouse, need tails)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mouse, has physical part tail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mouse, has physical part tail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mouse, has physical part tail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mouse, has physical part tail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(mouse, need tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mouse, need tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mouse, have long tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, have long tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mouse, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)