movie star: has physical part teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.74
, celebrity
Weight: 0.73
, famous person
Weight: 0.68
, film
Weight: 0.65
Siblings horror movie
Weight: 0.40
, rock star
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part teeth 1.00
have white teeth 0.88
has physical part hair 0.86
have perfect teeth 0.85
has physical part heads 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(celebrity, have white teeth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(celebrity, have white teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, have white teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rock star, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(celebrity, have white teeth)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rock star, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(rock star, has physical part hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(movie star, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part hair)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(movie star, have white teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(movie star, have perfect teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part heads)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part hair)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(movie star, has physical part heads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part hair)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part heads)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(movie star, have white teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(movie star, has physical part heads)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(movie star, have perfect teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(movie star, has physical part hair)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(movie star, have perfect teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(movie star, have white teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(movie star, have perfect teeth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, have white teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(celebrity, have white teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rock star, has physical part hair)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(movie star, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(celebrity, have white teeth)