movie star: wear sunglasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.74
, celebrity
Weight: 0.73
, famous person
Weight: 0.68
, film
Weight: 0.65
Siblings horror movie
Weight: 0.40
, rock star
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear sunglasses 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock star, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(celebrity, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rock star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rock star, wear sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rock star, wear sunglasses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(celebrity, wear sunglasses)