movie theater: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, entertainment
Weight: 0.68
, attraction
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.67
, shopping center
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cinema
Weight: 0.38
, movie theatre
Weight: 0.38
, movie screen
Weight: 0.37
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, musical
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00
is annoying 0.79
is entertaining 0.76
is lame 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(entertainment, is entertaining)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(movie theater, is boring)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(entertainment, is entertaining)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(entertainment, is entertaining)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(musical, is annoying)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(musical, is lame)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(musical, is entertaining)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(entertainment, is entertaining)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(movie theater, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(musical, is annoying)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(musical, is annoying)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(musical, is lame)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(musical, is lame)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(musical, is entertaining)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(musical, is entertaining)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(movie theater, is boring)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(movie theater, is annoying)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(movie theater, is annoying)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(movie theater, is annoying)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is annoying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(movie theater, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(entertainment, is entertaining)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(musical, is lame)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(musical, is annoying)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(musical, is entertaining)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(movie theater, is boring)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(entertainment, is entertaining)