movie: be project onto screen

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents horror movie
Weight: 0.76
, film
Weight: 0.73
, adaptation
Weight: 0.67
, medium
Weight: 0.62
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.74
, star trek
Weight: 0.69
, television show
Weight: 0.64
, armageddon
Weight: 0.64
, scream
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be project onto screen 1.00
be put onto film 0.84
be made of many photograph which flash quickly in succession on screen in darken room this give illusion of motion 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(film, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(movie, be project onto screen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(film, be project onto screen)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(film, be project onto screen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(film, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(movie, be project onto screen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(movie, be project onto screen)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(movie, be put onto film)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(movie, be put onto film)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(movie, be put onto film)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(movie, be put onto film)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(movie, be project onto screen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(movie, be project onto screen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(film, be project onto screen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(movie, be project onto screen)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(film, be project onto screen)