mri: hurt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, modality
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, brain
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.35
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.34
, cerebral palsy
Weight: 0.33
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.33
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mri, hurt)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, hurt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mri, hurt)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ultrasound, hurt)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, hurt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mri, hurt)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mri, hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mri, hurt)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mri, hurt)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mri, hurt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mri, hurt)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mri, hurt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mri, hurt)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ultrasound, hurt)