muffler: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exhaust
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.53
, device
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings headlight
Weight: 0.32
, toy car
Weight: 0.32
, windshield wiper
Weight: 0.32
, hood
Weight: 0.32
, valve
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(valve, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(windshield wiper, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(valve, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(valve, go bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(windshield wiper, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(windshield wiper, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(muffler, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(muffler, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(muffler, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(muffler, go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(muffler, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(muffler, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(muffler, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(valve, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(muffler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(windshield wiper, go bad)