mule: be at grand canyon

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, coin
Weight: 0.45
, label
Weight: 0.44
Siblings mare
Weight: 0.50
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.34
, donkey
Weight: 0.34
, llama
Weight: 0.34
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grand canyon 1.00
walk down into grand canyon 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mule, be at grand canyon)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mule, walk down into grand canyon)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mule, walk down into grand canyon)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mule, walk down into grand canyon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mule, walk down into grand canyon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mule, be at grand canyon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mule, be at grand canyon)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mule, be at grand canyon)