mummification: was good way preserve

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.49
, custom
Weight: 0.45
, aspect
Weight: 0.43
, practice
Weight: 0.41
, thing
Weight: 0.40
Siblings decomposition
Weight: 0.31
, fermentation
Weight: 0.31
, embalming
Weight: 0.31
, digestion
Weight: 0.30
, extraction
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good way preserve 1.00
was good 0.81
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mummification, was good way preserve)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(digestion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mummification, was good way preserve)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(digestion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(digestion, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(mummification, was good way preserve)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mummification, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mummification, was good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mummification, was good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mummification, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mummification, was good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mummification, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mummification, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mummification, was good way preserve)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(digestion, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mummification, was good way preserve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)