mumps: be included with diseases of digestive system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illness
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.65
, vaccine
Weight: 0.59
, infection
Weight: 0.56
, condition
Weight: 0.53
Siblings measles
Weight: 0.38
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.37
, flu
Weight: 0.37
, influenza
Weight: 0.37
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be included with diseases of digestive system 1.00
be included with diseases of system 0.92
be included with diseases 0.89
has state disease 0.77
provide immune 0.77
be in reproductive system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(measles, has state disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(illness, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(measles, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(measles, has state disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(flu, has state disease)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mumps, be included with diseases of system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mumps, be included with diseases)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mumps, be included with diseases)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mumps, has state disease)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mumps, has state disease)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mumps, has state disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mumps, has state disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, has state disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(influenza, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(flu, has state disease)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(mumps, be included with diseases of digestive system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illness, has state disease)