murder: be in tasmania hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.69
, crime
Weight: 0.64
, felony
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.62
, evil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honor killing
Weight: 0.69
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.63
, stabbing
Weight: 0.47
, homicide
Weight: 0.37
, rape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tasmania hard 1.00
be in tasmania 0.90
is hard 0.85
be in west virginia hard 0.81
be in alabama difficult 0.78
be within hard 0.77
be such big problem in india 0.76
is 5 hard 0.76
be such thing in india 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(act, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(evil, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(evil, be within hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(evil, is hard)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(crime, is hard)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(act, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(evil, is hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(act, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, is hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(evil, be within hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rape, be such big problem in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rape, be such thing in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(act, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(evil, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be within hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rape, be such thing in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rape, be such thing in india)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rape, be such big problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rape, be such big problem in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(murder, be in tasmania hard)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(murder, be in tasmania)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(murder, be in tasmania)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(murder, be in west virginia hard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(murder, be in alabama difficult)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama difficult)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(murder, be in alabama difficult)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(murder, be in alabama difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(crime, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(act, is hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, be within hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rape, be such thing in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rape, be such big problem in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, is hard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, be within hard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(crime, is hard)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(murder, be in tasmania hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(act, is hard)