mush: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents label
Weight: 0.44
, food
Weight: 0.44
, meal
Weight: 0.37
, anything
Weight: 0.33
, word
Weight: 0.31
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.30
, fried egg
Weight: 0.30
, oatmeal
Weight: 0.30
, meat pie
Weight: 0.30
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mush, has quality definition)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(label, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mush, has quality definition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mush, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(label, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(label, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality definition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(label, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality definition)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mush, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mush, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mush, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mush, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(label, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(label, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mush, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)