mush: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents label
Weight: 0.44
, food
Weight: 0.44
, meal
Weight: 0.37
, anything
Weight: 0.33
, word
Weight: 0.31
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.30
, fried egg
Weight: 0.30
, oatmeal
Weight: 0.30
, meat pie
Weight: 0.30
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality worth 0.85
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mush, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(label, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mush, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mush, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(label, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(label, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(label, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mush, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mush, has quality worth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mush, has quality worth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality worth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mush, has quality definition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mush, has quality definition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mush, has quality definition)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality worth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mush, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(label, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(label, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mush, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)