music: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rock music
Weight: 0.69
, entertainment
Weight: 0.64
, pop
Weight: 0.64
, opera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings chamber music
Weight: 0.79
, classical music
Weight: 0.72
, pop music
Weight: 0.71
, jazz
Weight: 0.66
, loud music
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
have good 0.84
is bad now 0.84
be bad today 0.82
be good on dxm 0.81
is bad most 0.80
is bad nowadays 0.80
is good high 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(opera, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pop, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(entertainment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(entertainment, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pop, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(opera, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rock music, be bad today)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pop, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(opera, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(entertainment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be bad today)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad nowadays)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(loud music, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(jazz, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(opera, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pop, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(entertainment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(rock music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(jazz, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(jazz, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(jazz, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad now)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(loud music, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(loud music, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(pop music, be bad today)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pop music, be bad today)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(classical music, be good on dxm)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pop music, is bad nowadays)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad nowadays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(music, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(entertainment, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rock music, be bad today)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pop, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opera, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(classical music, be good on dxm)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pop music, be bad today)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad now)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad nowadays)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jazz, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(loud music, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(entertainment, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pop, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opera, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rock music, be bad today)