mussel: be bad for lakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.64
, mollusk
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, seafood
Weight: 0.53
Siblings shellfish
Weight: 0.35
, oyster
Weight: 0.35
, algae
Weight: 0.35
, snail
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for lakes 1.00
be important to river life 0.79
be problem in inland waters 0.77
be problem in waters 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mussel, be bad for lakes)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mussel, be important to river life)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mussel, be problem in waters)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be important to river life)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mussel, be important to river life)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mussel, be important to river life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be bad for lakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mussel, be bad for lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mussel, be bad for lakes)