mussel: be problem in waters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.64
, mollusk
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, seafood
Weight: 0.53
Siblings shellfish
Weight: 0.35
, oyster
Weight: 0.35
, algae
Weight: 0.35
, snail
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in waters 1.00
be problem in inland waters 0.92
has state problem 0.78
be bad for lakes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mussel, be problem in waters)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mussel, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mussel, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in inland waters)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mussel, be bad for lakes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mussel, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mussel, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mussel, be problem in waters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mussel, be problem in waters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mussel, be problem in waters)