mustang: be bad in snow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, horse
Weight: 0.67
, vehicle
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, ford
Weight: 0.54
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, cheetah
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in snow 1.00
be in snow 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(mustang, be bad in snow)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mustang, be in snow)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mustang, be in snow)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mustang, be in snow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mustang, be in snow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustang, be bad in snow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mustang, be bad in snow)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mustang, be bad in snow)