mustang: is good cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, horse
Weight: 0.67
, vehicle
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, ford
Weight: 0.54
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, cheetah
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good cars 1.00
is cars 0.95
is good car 0.91
is car 0.85
is coolest cars 0.79
is funky car 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ford, is cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mustang, is good cars)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ford, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mustang, is good cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ford, is car)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ford, is cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, is cars)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ford, is car)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(ford, is cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mustang, is good cars)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ford, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mustang, is good cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(mustang, is good cars)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mustang, is cars)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mustang, is cars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mustang, is cars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is cars)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mustang, is good car)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mustang, is car)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(mustang, is car)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mustang, is good car)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is good car)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is car)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mustang, is car)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mustang, is good car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is good cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mustang, is good cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ford, is cars)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ford, is car)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ford, is car)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mustang, is good cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ford, is cars)