mustang: is rear wheel drive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, horse
Weight: 0.67
, vehicle
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, ford
Weight: 0.54
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, cheetah
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rear wheel drive 1.00
is car 0.78
is good car 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ford, is car)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mustang, is rear wheel drive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ford, is car)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ford, is car)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ford, is car)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mustang, is rear wheel drive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(mustang, is rear wheel drive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mustang, is car)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(mustang, is car)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mustang, is car)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is car)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mustang, is good car)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mustang, is good car)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is good car)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mustang, is good car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is rear wheel drive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mustang, is rear wheel drive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ford, is car)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(mustang, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ford, is car)