mustard: be good on hot dog

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sauce
Weight: 0.61
, spice
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.60
, plant
Weight: 0.57
, meat
Weight: 0.56
Siblings horseradish
Weight: 0.57
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.35
, mayonnaise
Weight: 0.35
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.34
, sauerkraut
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good on hot dog 1.00
be at hot dog 0.97
be put on hot dog 0.96
be spicy or hot 0.80
be spicy hot 0.79
be used to fee dog 0.76
be nice to eat 0.75
be good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be used to fee dog)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauce, be spicy or hot)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to fee dog)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to fee dog)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauce, be spicy or hot)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be used to fee dog)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mustard, be good on hot dog)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mustard, be at hot dog)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be at hot dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mustard, be put on hot dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be put on hot dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mustard, be put on hot dog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mustard, be at hot dog)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mustard, be put on hot dog)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mustard, be at hot dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(meat, be used to fee dog)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(mustard, be good on hot dog)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(meat, be used to fee dog)