mustard: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sauce
Weight: 0.61
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.61
, spice
Weight: 0.61
, flavor
Weight: 0.60
, food
Weight: 0.60
Siblings horseradish
Weight: 0.57
, mustard gas
Weight: 0.38
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.38
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.35
, mayonnaise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
mean good 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spice, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spice, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mayonnaise, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(spice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(spice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mayonnaise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mayonnaise, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mustard, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mustard, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mustard, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mustard, mean good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mustard, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mustard, mean good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mustard, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mustard, mean good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mustard, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mustard, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mustard, mean good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mustard, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spice, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mayonnaise, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(spice, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spice, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mustard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)