mutation: be beneficial to process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variation
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.51
Siblings polymorphism
Weight: 0.54
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, gene
Weight: 0.34
, genotype
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to process 1.00
be beneficial 0.91
is helpful 0.81
be beneficial to population 0.80
be important in process of natural selection 0.80
be important to spectation 0.77
be harmful 0.75
is harmful 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(concept, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(concept, is helpful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(concept, is helpful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(concept, is helpful)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, is helpful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to population)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be important to spectation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be harmful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, is harmful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mutation, be beneficial)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mutation, be beneficial)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to population)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mutation, be harmful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(mutation, is helpful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(mutation, is harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mutation, is helpful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mutation, be beneficial to population)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mutation, be harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mutation, be harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mutation, is helpful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(mutation, is harmful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mutation, is harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mutation, be important to spectation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mutation, be important to spectation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mutation, be important to spectation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(concept, is helpful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(concept, is helpful)