mutation: be beneficial to process of evolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variation
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.51
Siblings polymorphism
Weight: 0.54
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, gene
Weight: 0.34
, genotype
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to process of evolution 1.00
be necessary to process of evolution 0.94
be important to evolution 0.90
be important in evolution 0.90
be important for evolution 0.90
affect evolution 0.88
be essential evolution occur 0.87
contribute to evolution 0.86
operate together in process of evolution 0.86
be needed evolution occur 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(variation, be important for evolution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variation, be important to evolution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variation, affect evolution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(variation, affect evolution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(variation, be important to evolution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(variation, be important for evolution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important to evolution)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important for evolution)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(variation, affect evolution)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(polymorphism, be important to evolution)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variation, be important to evolution)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(variation, be important for evolution)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(variation, affect evolution)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(polymorphism, be important to evolution)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(polymorphism, be important to evolution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mutation, affect evolution)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mutation, affect evolution)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be important to evolution)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be important for evolution)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mutation, be important for evolution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mutation, affect evolution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mutation, affect evolution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mutation, be important to evolution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mutation, affect evolution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mutation, affect evolution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mutation, affect evolution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mutation, be important for evolution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mutation, be important to evolution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mutation, affect evolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mutation, be important for evolution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mutation, be important to evolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(variation, affect evolution)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(variation, be important for evolution)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(variation, be important to evolution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(polymorphism, be important to evolution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(variation, affect evolution)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(variation, be important for evolution)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(variation, be important to evolution)