mutation: be important in process of natural selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variation
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.51
Siblings polymorphism
Weight: 0.54
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, gene
Weight: 0.34
, genotype
Weight: 0.33
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in process of natural selection 1.00
be involved in natural selection 0.93
affect natural selection 0.93
be benefit for natural selection 0.91
be beneficial to process 0.80
is random process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(variation, affect natural selection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(variation, affect natural selection)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(variation, affect natural selection)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(variation, affect natural selection)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mutation, affect natural selection)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be involved in natural selection)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mutation, affect natural selection)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mutation, affect natural selection)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mutation, be involved in natural selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mutation, affect natural selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mutation, be involved in natural selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be benefit for natural selection)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mutation, be benefit for natural selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mutation, be involved in natural selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mutation, be benefit for natural selection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mutation, be benefit for natural selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be beneficial to process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mutation, be beneficial to process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mutation, be beneficial to process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mutation, be beneficial to process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(variation, affect natural selection)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mutation, be important in process of natural selection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(variation, affect natural selection)