mute swan: be get to indiana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.64
, swan
Weight: 0.57
, wildlife
Weight: 0.52
Siblings black swan
Weight: 0.40
, trumpeter swan
Weight: 0.38
, heron
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be get to indiana 1.00
be get to michigan 0.86
is michigan 0.83
be get to america 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mute swan, be get to indiana)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, is michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mute swan, is michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mute swan, is michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mute swan, be get to america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mute swan, is michigan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mute swan, be get to america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mute swan, be get to america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, be get to america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, be get to indiana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mute swan, be get to indiana)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mute swan, be get to indiana)