mute swan: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.64
, swan
Weight: 0.57
, wildlife
Weight: 0.52
Siblings black swan
Weight: 0.40
, trumpeter swan
Weight: 0.38
, heron
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality evil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(owl, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(owl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(owl, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mute swan, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mute swan, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(mute swan, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mute swan, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mute swan, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mute swan, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(owl, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mute swan, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)