mute swan: is michigan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.64
, swan
Weight: 0.57
, wildlife
Weight: 0.52
Siblings black swan
Weight: 0.40
, trumpeter swan
Weight: 0.38
, heron
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is michigan 1.00
be get to michigan 0.99
be get to indiana 0.83
be get to america 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mute swan, is michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mute swan, be get to michigan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mute swan, be get to indiana)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mute swan, be get to america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, be get to indiana)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mute swan, be get to america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mute swan, be get to indiana)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, be get to america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mute swan, be get to america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mute swan, be get to indiana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, is michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mute swan, is michigan)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mute swan, is michigan)