mutt: be better than purebreds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.52
, person
Weight: 0.50
, comic strip
Weight: 0.42
, name
Weight: 0.42
Siblings puppy
Weight: 0.33
, beagle
Weight: 0.33
, dog poop
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.33
, poodle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than purebreds 1.00
be smarter than purebreds 0.97
be healthier than purebreds 0.97
is dogs 0.79
make dogs 0.79
is best dogs 0.79
make best dogs 0.78
be called mutts 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mutt, is dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mutt, make dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mutt, is dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mutt, make dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mutt, is dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mutt, make dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mutt, be called mutts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mutt, make best dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mutt, be called mutts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mutt, be called mutts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mutt, make best dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mutt, make best dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mutt, make best dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be called mutts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mutt, make dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)