mutt: is best dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.52
, person
Weight: 0.50
, comic strip
Weight: 0.42
, name
Weight: 0.42
Siblings puppy
Weight: 0.33
, beagle
Weight: 0.33
, dog poop
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.33
, poodle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best dogs 1.00
make best dogs 0.97
is dogs 0.92
make dogs 0.90
be better than purebreds 0.79
be smarter than purebreds 0.78
be healthier than purebreds 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(mutt, is best dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mutt, make best dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mutt, is dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mutt, make best dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(mutt, is dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mutt, is dogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mutt, make dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mutt, make best dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mutt, make dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mutt, make dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mutt, make best dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mutt, be better than purebreds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mutt, be better than purebreds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mutt, be better than purebreds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be better than purebreds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mutt, make dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be smarter than purebreds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mutt, is best dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)