myocardial infarction: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.74
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.73
, heart disease
Weight: 0.70
, blood vessel
Weight: 0.70
, pathology
Weight: 0.68
Siblings atrial fibrillation
Weight: 0.39
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.39
, coronary artery
Weight: 0.38
, cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.38
, pleural effusion
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(heart disease, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pathology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(heart disease, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(myocardial infarction, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(myocardial infarction, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)