na: be bad at cs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rapper
Weight: 0.54
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.53
, element
Weight: 0.51
, act
Weight: 0.49
Siblings ra
Weight: 0.33
, nas
Weight: 0.33
, paul simon
Weight: 0.32
, taj mahal
Weight: 0.32
, leo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at cs 1.00
be cs bad 0.99
be bad at cs go 0.98
be cs considered bad 0.96
be cs worse than eu cs 0.94
be weaker than eu in cs 0.87
be cs considered trash 0.84
be better than eu 0.75
be much worse than eu 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(na, be bad at cs)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(na, be cs worse than eu cs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(na, be bad at cs go)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad at cs go)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(na, be bad at cs go)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(na, be bad at cs go)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(na, be cs worse than eu cs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(na, be weaker than eu in cs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(na, be cs considered bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(na, be cs considered bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(na, be cs considered bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(na, be cs considered bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(na, be cs worse than eu cs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(na, be better than eu)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(na, be weaker than eu in cs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(na, be cs considered trash)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(na, be cs considered trash)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(na, be much worse than eu)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(na, be better than eu)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(na, be cs considered trash)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(na, be much worse than eu)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(na, be cs considered trash)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(na, be weaker than eu in cs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(na, be cs worse than eu cs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(na, be much worse than eu)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(na, be better than eu)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(na, be weaker than eu in cs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(na, be much worse than eu)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(na, be better than eu)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad at cs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(na, be bad at cs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(na, be bad at cs)