na: be weak as region

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rapper
Weight: 0.54
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.53
, element
Weight: 0.51
, act
Weight: 0.49
Siblings ra
Weight: 0.33
, nas
Weight: 0.33
, paul simon
Weight: 0.32
, taj mahal
Weight: 0.32
, leo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be weak as region 1.00
is weak region 0.98
be considered region 0.83
be considered weakest of major regions 0.82
be considered major region 0.81
be bad compared to other regions 0.80
be bad compared to regions 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(na, be weak as region)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(na, be considered weakest of major regions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(na, be considered weakest of major regions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad compared to other regions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(na, be considered weakest of major regions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(na, be considered major region)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(na, be considered major region)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(na, be considered major region)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(na, be considered major region)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(na, be considered weakest of major regions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(na, be weak as region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(na, be weak as region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(na, be weak as region)