nail polish: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stain
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.66
, paint
Weight: 0.64
, hand
Weight: 0.61
Siblings glitter
Weight: 0.61
, nail
Weight: 0.37
, nail clipper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
is invented 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(paint, was invented)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nail polish, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(paint, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paint, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(paint, was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(nail polish, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(nail polish, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(nail polish, is invented)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, is invented)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nail polish, is invented)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(nail polish, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nail polish, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(paint, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(nail polish, was invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(paint, was invented)