name: become popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symbol
Weight: 0.69
, nickname
Weight: 0.68
, identifier
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.62
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.85
, alias
Weight: 0.65
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.63
, description
Weight: 0.63
, username
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
become popular 1.00
is popular 0.91
is popular now 0.89
be popular today 0.84
become interesting 0.80
become available 0.79
become synonymous 0.79
become synonymous with ideas 0.76
is most important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brand, is popular)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(name, become popular)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brand, is popular now)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(name, become popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brand, is popular now)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(brand, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular now)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(description, become interesting)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(domain name, become available)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brand, is popular)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(name, become popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brand, is popular now)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(name, become popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(domain name, become available)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(domain name, become available)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(description, become interesting)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(description, become interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(name, become popular)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(name, is most important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(name, is most important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(name, is most important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(name, is most important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(name, become popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, is popular now)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brand, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(domain name, become available)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(description, become interesting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, is popular now)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(name, become popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brand, is popular)