nanotechnology: change all technology

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, field
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, science
Weight: 0.58
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, solar cell
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33
, silicon
Weight: 0.33
, biology
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
change all technology 1.00
be at technology 0.88
be change 0.82
meld our biology and our technology 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(science, be at technology)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, change all technology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(technology, be change)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, change all technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(science, be at technology)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(technology, be change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(technology, be change)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(science, be at technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(science, be at technology)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, change all technology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(technology, be change)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, change all technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, change all technology)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, meld our biology and our technology)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, meld our biology and our technology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, meld our biology and our technology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, meld our biology and our technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, change all technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, be at technology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(technology, be change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, be at technology)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nanotechnology, change all technology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(technology, be change)