napalm: was deadly weapon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.68
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, chemical
Weight: 0.49
, fire
Weight: 0.48
Siblings mustard gas
Weight: 0.35
, sarin
Weight: 0.35
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.34
, nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.34
, pepper spray
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was deadly weapon 1.00
was weapon 0.93
was deadly 0.88
is dangerous 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(weapon, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chemical weapon, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fire, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fire, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(weapon, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(weapon, is dangerous)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, is dangerous)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fire, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pepper spray, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biological weapon, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mustard gas, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(weapon, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chemical weapon, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fire, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mustard gas, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mustard gas, is dangerous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biological weapon, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(biological weapon, is dangerous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pepper spray, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pepper spray, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(napalm, was deadly weapon)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(napalm, was weapon)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(napalm, was weapon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(napalm, was weapon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was weapon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(napalm, was deadly)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, is dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(napalm, was deadly)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(napalm, was deadly)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(napalm, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(napalm, is dangerous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(napalm, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fire, is dangerous)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, is dangerous)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(weapon, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mustard gas, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(biological weapon, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pepper spray, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fire, is dangerous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, is dangerous)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(napalm, was deadly weapon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(weapon, is dangerous)