nape: has quality spot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.32
, body
Weight: 0.29
, wig
Weight: 0.27
, scalp
Weight: 0.27
, braid
Weight: 0.26
Siblings cheek
Weight: 0.26
, thigh
Weight: 0.26
, torso
Weight: 0.25
, belly
Weight: 0.25
, eyebrow
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality spot 1.00
is weak spot 0.85
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.76
be weak spot of titans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(wig, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nape, has quality spot)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(scalp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nape, has quality spot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(scalp, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wig, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scalp, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wig, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(thigh, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(belly, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(wig, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(nape, has quality spot)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(scalp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(nape, has quality spot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(thigh, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(thigh, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(belly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(belly, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(nape, has quality spot)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(nape, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nape, is weak spot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(nape, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nape, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(nape, is weak spot)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(nape, be weak spot of titans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(nape, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(nape, is weak spot)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nape, is weak spot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(nape, be weak spot of titans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(nape, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(nape, be weak spot of titans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nape, be weak spot of titans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(nape, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nape, has quality spot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wig, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(scalp, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(thigh, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(belly, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wig, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(nape, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(scalp, has quality bad)