napoleon: was bad leader

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.60
, emperor
Weight: 0.58
, figure
Weight: 0.58
, pastry
Weight: 0.57
, ruler
Weight: 0.55
Siblings brioche
Weight: 0.33
, waiter
Weight: 0.33
, adam smith
Weight: 0.32
, osama bin laden
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad leader 1.00
was bonaparte bad leader 1.00
was successful as military leader 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(osama bin laden, was bad leader)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(osama bin laden, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(osama bin laden, was bad leader)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(napoleon, was bad leader)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(napoleon, was bonaparte bad leader)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(napoleon, was bonaparte bad leader)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(napoleon, was bonaparte bad leader)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was bonaparte bad leader)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(napoleon, was successful as military leader)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was successful as military leader)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(napoleon, was successful as military leader)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(napoleon, was successful as military leader)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was bad leader)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(napoleon, was bad leader)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was bad leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(osama bin laden, was bad leader)