narrator: be in invisible man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.52
, detective
Weight: 0.52
Siblings heroine
Weight: 0.34
, villain
Weight: 0.34
, script
Weight: 0.33
, avenger
Weight: 0.33
, spider man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in invisible man 1.00
be invisible in invisible man 0.99
get expelled in invisible man 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(narrator, be in invisible man)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(narrator, be invisible in invisible man)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(narrator, be invisible in invisible man)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(narrator, get expelled in invisible man)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(narrator, be invisible in invisible man)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(narrator, get expelled in invisible man)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(narrator, get expelled in invisible man)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(narrator, be invisible in invisible man)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(narrator, get expelled in invisible man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(narrator, be in invisible man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(narrator, be in invisible man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(narrator, be in invisible man)