narwhal: be important to ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whale
Weight: 0.70
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, arctic
Weight: 0.49
, species
Weight: 0.47
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.40
, whale shark
Weight: 0.39
, blue whale
Weight: 0.39
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to ecosystem 1.00
be important to ocean ecosystem 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, be important to ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(whale shark, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(whale shark, be important to ecosystem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(narwhal, be important to ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(narwhal, be important to ocean ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(narwhal, be important to ocean ecosystem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(narwhal, be important to ocean ecosystem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(narwhal, be important to ocean ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(narwhal, be important to ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(narwhal, be important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(whale shark, be important to ecosystem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(narwhal, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(humpback whale, be important to ecosystem)