national monument: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monument
Weight: 0.82
, land
Weight: 0.69
, area
Weight: 0.62
, site
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grand canyon
Weight: 0.69
, capitol
Weight: 0.56
, statue
Weight: 0.40
, memorial
Weight: 0.39
, national park
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national monument, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(monument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(memorial, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(national monument, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(memorial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(memorial, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(national monument, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(national monument, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national monument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(monument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(memorial, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(national monument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(monument, has quality good)