national park: is unique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national forest
Weight: 0.77
, area
Weight: 0.70
, land
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.69
Siblings grand canyon
Weight: 0.74
, death valley
Weight: 0.69
, beach
Weight: 0.63
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unique 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(national park, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is unique)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national park, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(death valley, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(death valley, is unique)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national park, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(national park, is unique)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(national park, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(national park, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(national park, is unique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national park, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(national park, is unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(national park, is unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(death valley, is unique)