national parks: be protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected 1.00
is protected 1.00
be is protected 1.00
is protected area 0.92
be protected by government 0.91
need protecting 0.80
is preserved 0.79
protect environment 0.78
help protect 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(park, be protected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(park, help protect)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(park, be is protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(park, be protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(park, help protect)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(park, be protected)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(park, be is protected)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(park, help protect)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, be is protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national park, be is protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(park, be protected)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(national parks, be protected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(national parks, be protected)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(park, help protect)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(national parks, be protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national park, be is protected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is protected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(yellowstone, is protected area)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is protected area)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, be is protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, be is protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(national parks, be protected)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(national parks, is protected)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(national parks, is protected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(national parks, is protected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(national parks, is preserved)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is preserved)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(national parks, is preserved)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected by government)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected by government)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(national parks, is preserved)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(national parks, be protected by government)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(national parks, be protected by government)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(national parks, need protecting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(national parks, protect environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(national parks, protect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help protect)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(national parks, need protecting)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(national parks, help protect)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(national parks, need protecting)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(national parks, help protect)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(national parks, need protecting)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(national parks, help protect)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national parks, be protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(park, be is protected)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(park, be protected)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(park, help protect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national park, be is protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is protected area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, be is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(park, be is protected)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(park, be protected)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national parks, be protected)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(park, help protect)