national parks: help communities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
help communities 1.00
help community 0.90
be important to community 0.83
be good for community 0.81
be important in towns 0.80
help environment 0.79
be in city help 0.78
have considered influences on community health departments 0.77
have considered positive influences on community health departments 0.76
have necessary in cities system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(park, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be important in towns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(park, be in city help)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(park, help communities)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(park, be important in towns)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be important to community)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be good for community)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in towns)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(park, help communities)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be good for community)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(park, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national parks, help communities)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national parks, help communities)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be good for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national parks, help communities)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be important in towns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national parks, help communities)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national parks, help communities)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national parks, help communities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(national parks, help communities)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(national parks, help community)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(national parks, help environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(national parks, help environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(national parks, help environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(national parks, help community)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, help communities)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in towns)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be good for community)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, help communities)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in towns)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be good for community)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(national parks, help communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)