national parks: help community

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
help community 1.00
be important to community 0.92
be good for community 0.91
help communities 0.90
be in city help 0.82
help environment 0.79
have considered positive influences on community health departments 0.78
have considered influences on community health departments 0.77
be important to people of city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be good for community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(park, help communities)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(park, be in city help)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be important to community)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be good for community)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(park, help communities)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be good for community)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(park, help communities)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(national parks, help community)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be good for community)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(national parks, help community)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(park, help communities)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(national parks, help community)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(national parks, help community)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(national parks, help community)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(national parks, help community)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(national parks, help communities)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(national parks, help communities)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(national parks, help communities)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(national parks, help environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(national parks, help environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(national parks, help environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help communities)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(national parks, help community)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, help communities)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be good for community)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be good for community)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, help communities)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(national parks, help community)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)