national parks: is important america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is important america 1.00
is america 0.97
is park important to america 0.90
be named america 0.89
is national park important to america 0.87
be in middle of north america 0.85
is important australia 0.80
be important to chicago 0.80
is important uk 0.80
be in africa 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(park, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national parks, is important america)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(united states, be named america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national parks, is important america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(united states, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national parks, is important america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(united states, be named america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(united states, be in africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(park, be important to chicago)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(united states, be in africa)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to chicago)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(united states, be named america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is park important to america)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in middle of north america)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important to america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(united states, be named america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(national parks, is important america)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(park, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(national parks, is important america)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(united states, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(national parks, is important america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(yellowstone, is park important to america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is park important to america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(yellowstone, is national park important to america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is national park important to america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(yellowstone, be in middle of north america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be in middle of north america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(national parks, is important america)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(national parks, is america)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(national parks, is america)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(national parks, is america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(national parks, is important australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(national parks, is important australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national parks, is important australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national parks, is important america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(united states, be named america)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(united states, be in africa)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in middle of north america)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is park important to america)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is national park important to america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(united states, be named america)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(united states, be in africa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(national parks, is important america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to chicago)